Toll-Free : 800-310-9769
Main Phone Number : 214-219-9900
Fax Number : 214-219-9456

Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic, The Bassett Firm’s physical office is temporarily closed, but we remain open for business and will continue to fight the good fight for you. Please call or email us if there is anything that you need.

We Know Texas | We Know Business

At The Bassett Firm, we provide peace of mind. We are trial attorneys. Not litigators, but attorneys who try cases. Our years of trial experience protect you and your company.

Home » Texas Supreme Court Weekly Update » December 19, 2016

December 19, 2016

4Front Engineered Solutions Inc. v. Carlos Rosales, et al. – 15-0298

This case arose from an incident in which an electrician was injured when a forklift overturned. The forklift had been borrowed from the property owner by another independent contractor. The electrician asserted a negligent entrustment claim against the property owner and claimed that the property owner failed to make sure that the independent contractor, who the property owner permitted to use the forklift, was competent to do so.

The Texas Supreme Court clarified that a negligent entrustment claim requires more than a showing of general negligence. Instead, in order to prevail on a negligent entrustment claim based on a failure to screen, the electrician would have to establish that (1) the property owner did not make inquiries and (2) if the property owner had made inquiries it would have discovered facts that would have caused a reasonable employer to believe that the independent contractor was incompetent or reckless. The Court further clarified that, unless there is a statutory requirement to be licensed, the mere lack of formal training or certification is insufficient to establish such incompetence or recklessness.

In this case, the Court concluded that, even if the property owner had made inquiries, there was no evidence of any prior habits or experiences that would have caused the property owner to reasonably believe that the independent contractor could not or would not competently operate the forklift; therefore, the evidence did not support the jury’s finding of negligent entrustment.

Contact
The Bassett Firm